Talk:Nocturnal emission

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of reproduction.

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nocturnal emission article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 months

"while vaginal lubrication may not indicate orgasm"

The phrase makes no sense since the article states that a wet dream doesn't necessarily include orgasm in the very first sentence. So why is the certainty of a wet dream questioned? --94.134.89.1 (talk) 03:46, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Video link removal

I have noticed that the link to the Wikimedia Commons video featuring a nocturnal emission has been removed. That video showcases the subject of this article and can better help the readers visualise what a nocturnal emission is. I believe it has educational value, and removing it might not have contributed to the betterment of the article, as much as it may have been intended. Should it be edited back to the external links section? Tuotettasi (talk) 20:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GRATUITOUS applies in this case. I do not see that such a video is needed to better understand this topic. I don't think that its removal is detrimental to the article. As for linking it in the External links section, I have no strong opinion on that. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 02:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

تجربیات خودتون رو بنویسید

۱ 204.18.167.115 (talk) 09:11, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

“…may lead to pregnancy”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MobileDiff/1210867908&title=Special%3AMobileDiff%2F1210867908&diff=1210867908&diffonly=1

Theoretically, yes, if a man and woman sleep naked together in an embrace facing each other and there is an emission of semen while they sleep then it *might* possibly result indeed in a pregnancy ChecksMix (talk) 20:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

“109% of men”

That is not how statistics work.

The source states that 97.3% of men aged 24 had at least one wet dream. Calvin Ransom (talk) 05:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]